Dog Owners, Walkers Must Take Charge to Make Parks Safe
Regardless of whether Albany adopts new rules for the Bulb and beach, the onus is on canine lovers to promote appropriate practices.
Over the past several months, I have watched with great interest the debate surrounding the push for a new waterfront dog policy to regulate activity there.
A draft proposal by Albany's Waterfront Committee got a public airing Jan. 24, and a joint meeting with the city is scheduled.
Passion is abundant on both sides of a complex issue that boils down to this: Dog owners want Albany Beach to remain an off-leash romping ground, while non-dog owners would like to protect it, and other parts of the park, from over-exuberant canines and owners who cannot be trusted.
Officials say much of the rationale behind the new policy relates to plans to hand over the Albany Bulb to state park control. The proposed policy would bring the area in line with state regulations, which officials say they hope would make the transition easier in the long run.
Ultimately, responsibility lies squarely with dog owners and professional walkers to follow safe and appropriate practices, regardless of whether the city adopts an ordinance that bans dogs from and requires them to remain on leash on the Neck and Plateau. And that's not just at the Bulb – that's how it should be at any dog park or multi-use open space.
Owners and pros alike need to consider whether their dogs are a good fit for an off-leash park. It's difficult for many owners to admit that their pooches aren't perfect. But an honest assessment of a dog's strengths and weaknesses is essential for creating a pleasant and safe experience for everyone.
"Dogs in dense urban areas often are edgy and reactive with other dogs and even people," said Veronica Boutelle, former director of training and behavior at the San Francisco SPCA and founder of dogTEC, which offers the country's most widely recognized professional dog-walker certification program.
"Here in the Bay Area, though, we enjoy highly socialized dogs who can say hello to each other and meet new people on the street gracefully," said Boutelle, who ran her own dog-walking business in the East Bay for years.
"No doubt this is in part due to the large number of guardians who take their dogs out regularly to run and play, and those who send their dogs out with professional walkers to do the same," she continued. "Reducing the places for this kind of activity, and forcing dogs into smaller spaces, is likely to lead to increased incidents between dogs. Far better to insist that dog walkers and the general public adhere to standards of conduct, including seeking training and education about dog behavior and following maximum pack size limitations."
There is no straightforward litmus test to tell whether your dog is safe for a park. In general, however, if your pooch isn't comfortable being greeted by dogs that are off leash, then the off-leash setting is not best. Instead, try the Bay Trail, where it's safe to walk or run with a dog on leash for miles.
Trainers and behaviorists will tell you that overly fearful dogs aren't a good fit for a dog park. It's one thing if your dog is cautious – remaining on the fringes, sizing up the situation before joining other dogs in play or deciding to go it alone with her nose to the ground – and another to be so gripped by fear that she will fight when approached by an otherwise well-meaning playmate.
The miles of off-leash trails in places such as Tilden Regional Park or Point Pinole Regional Shoreline may offer a less-stressful outing – more space, fewer dogs.
Just as troubling are dogs that become aggressive in what would be considered a normal social situation. Many shelter dogs were poorly socialized when young, and they fit this category. People often think of the snarling, lunging dog chained in a yard when they picture aggression. So it can be hard for some to identify their dog's behavior as aggressive.
If your dog can only play well with certain types of dogs, and he becomes intense with the "wrong" kind, that is aggression. Because you can't control who else is at the park, perhaps this Fido should stay home.
But temperament isn't the only thing that can be problematic. Even something as seemingly innocuous as fetch has its downside: Ball-throwing can incite a dog's prey drive and increase arousal levels. Other dogs may be tempted to join the fun, which can create tremendous frustration for their humans if those dogs don't recall when balls are involved and can cause competition among the dogs, potentially leading to a fight. And if your dog is a guarder, then keep that ball at home.
Owners and walkers should be aware that they are responsible for how others view dogs at the park. Those who act indifferent to the dangers and the rules are acting irresponsibly and are threats to the unparalleled freedoms we have in the East Bay. If Albany adopts new regulations for the Bulb, owners must follow them, or the divide between "dog people" and those who aren't will only grow.
If you don't like the rules – at the Bulb, Point Isabel, in El Cerrito or anywhere else – don't go to that park.
Still, even with the most well-vetted dogs and responsible people, problems will arise. If there is a fight, be sure to check dogs for injury. Exchange personal information with other owners, as injuries sometimes aren't apparent until later, then leave. Know that adrenaline is coursing through your dog's body, and it takes four days for adrenaline levels to return to normal.
During that time, the dog will be "hyper adrenaline," meaning she will be quicker to take offense or become overwhelmed, fearful or over-stimulated. A responsible owner or walker will recognize that they need a break from the park and be careful to keep stimulation reduced for several days.
Likewise, if your dog runs into or knocks over a person at the park, leash your dog and be respectful of the human and his or her needs. While anyone who visits a multi-use park must be aware that interaction with dogs is a possibility, they should not be tormented by the pups' presence.
And don't forget about the poop. Always carry bags to pick up after your dog as quickly as possible. Even better, consider how clean our parks would be if everyone adopted a two-for-one approach and picked up an extra poop for every one their dog contributed.
Much of this seems like common sense, but bad behavior – both human and dog – is rampant in the parks. The bottom line is that the more responsibility we all take and the more courtesies we extend each other, the safer and more enjoyable our multi-use parks will be for everyone.
Would you like alerts when we write about dog issues in Albany? Click the "Keep me posted" button below. You can also watch the most recent Waterfront Committee meeting regarding dogs online from KALB 33.
Todd Perlman is an entrepreneur and veteran journalist who has worked in Maryland, New Jersey and the East Bay. He lives in El Cerrito and is a manager at Metro Dog, a dog day care and boarding center in Richmond near Point Isabel. Learn more about "dogumentarian" Kendra Luck on her website, www.dogumentarian.com.
John Stashik
7:37 am on Tuesday, February 1, 2011
It's too bad such scrutiny doesn't also apply to humans and parks. A good many people abuse and trash the parks and, perhaps, they need to be leashed or under some type of control. Many dogs have better manners.
Sarajane Forbes
3:23 pm on Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Thanks Todd for the well put article. I don't know If I ever shared with you, but my youngest was attacked by a dog at the bulb, AND the dog ran off with her shoe.. The owner never called for the dog, found us to apologize, or return the shoe he had ran off with. All in all it probably was more of an "over friendly" greeting than actual attack. He pounced up on her and knocked her to the ground ( and out of her shoes) and hovered over her while she cried. Had the owner tried to make it right instead of ignore us we would have been able to shake it off, but that never happened. We are finally at a place where we can visit areas with large dogs again, but it took a long time.
It just boils down to manners.......
Todd Perlman
5:38 pm on Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Hi Sarajane,
No, you never told me about that, and I'm sorry it happened. It takes only a discourteous owner/walker or two to cast all in a bad light, and most are actually quite responsible and mindful of what's appropriate at a multi-use space. I hope your youngest has since had some more positive experiences with dogs. Happy to talk to you about it some more.
Mary Barnsdale
8:41 pm on Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Todd, the argument about easing the transition to State control is bogus. The agreement is to turn the Bulb over to the State by 2053 or earlier. But Albany has to clean up the rebar, "unauthorized art," encampments, etc., first. That won't happen any time soon.
So to disenfranchise the 39 percent-plus of us who own dogs (according to the Humane Society) for the next 40 years so the Bulb is in-line with future State regs is crazy. If the State were to take it over tomorrow, they'd change the rules tomorrow. They're not shy.
As to protecting the Bulb from over-exuberant canines... we're not talking about pristine wilderness here. The Bulb is largely unimproved landfill replete with rebar, broken concrete, mercury and lead. The dogs do a lot less damage to the Bulb than cattle do to Tilden Park.
There are easy compromises that could make most parties pretty happy here -- but there seems to have been no outreach to the large community of regular and committed park-goers who bring their dogs. Their wants, needs, and rights are not reflected.
And yes: rights. The traditional thinking is that park set-asides should be picnic areas, sports fields, swimming, fishing, play structures, golf, etc. None of those do a thing for many dog-owners. When not working hard to pay city and State taxes, they want to romp in the outdoors with their dogs. Is that so bad? It’s a pretty benign activity that should be encouraged -- and it's something a huge percentage of the constituency wants.
Emilie Raguso
10:56 pm on Tuesday, February 1, 2011
It would be great if many of these owners do show up at the next meeting. There weren't too many people at the last one (though a few did speak on this issue). Let me know if you'd like to submit a letter to the editor on this subject (http://patch.com/A-319).
Pam
1:24 pm on Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Good article and good comments. Please also consider the large impact that dogs have on wildlife. Yes, the Albany Beach, Bulb, and Plateau need work to evolve from unimproved landfill to high quality habitat. But don't tell the birds (including rare and sensitive species), because they are already there in significant numbers and they need that space, too. So much of their habitat was dredged, paved over, and made toxic that they don't have much of a choice of where they can breed, let alone over winter. Ongoing studies show the importance of this waterfront for shorebirds. Please attend the meetings and learn about the proposed improvements and the needs of the wildlife.
Tim Q. Cannon
1:46 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012
No mention at all about the 2 other off leash areas in Albany: Memorial Park and Terrace Park, where, curiously, the owner of the home bordering the south entrance regularly opens her door, lets the dog out onto the park unattended, where it does it's business and then returns home. Then there are the dog owners who ignore the "No dogs in fenced area" signs at Terrace and piles a re often found on the courts. Off leash advocates have plenty of rights here, some of which they flout.
Gary Kratkin
3:43 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Can someone point me to current rules regarding dogs at Terrace Park? I couldn't find anything on the city website.
Caryl O'Keefe
11:32 pm on Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Gary, this link to City of Albany website has current rules regarding dogs in Albany parks: http://www.albanyca.org/index.aspx?page=825 . Terrace Park is not specifically named here, but note prohibition, in all parks, of dogs in "play structures". City code at http://clerkshq.com/default.ashx?clientsite=albany-ca has more info re dogs,in general (chapter 10-4.2) they may be off-leash - so long as they are under control. Those exercising control are required to pick up after the dogs. "Except as otherwise provided, no domestic animal, except cats, shall be permitted to be on public property or the private property of anyone other than the guardian/owner unless under proper control and supervision by a capable person. Any domestic animal found at-large within City limits shall be impounded."
Emilie Raguso
12:51 am on Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Thanks, Caryl! I knew I'd seen this information somewhere but you nailed it!