Could Free Parking Become a Thing of Albany's Past?
Three Albany panels will discuss the future of parking in the city. Parking meters, permit programs and other alternatives will be considered to bring the city's parking policy in line with its environmental goals.
Members of Albany's Planning & Zoning Commission, Traffic & Safety Commission and Sustainability Committee will meet together on Tuesday to discuss changes to the city's parking policy.
See the meeting agenda and details below this story. Click the "Keep me posted" button below for alerts when we cover this topic.
In October, the Planning & Zoning Commission met to discuss parking issues in Albany. The commission decided that a joint meeting, with Traffic & Safety and Sustainability panelists, would be key before recommending any changes in the city's parking policies.
The city's parking policies are based on Measure D, a 1978 measure "to restore a reasonable balance between single and multiple unit homes in Albany, and to halt the steady increase in congestion in City streets," according to the Jan. 24 staff report.
One of the measure's key points was the establishment of the requirement of two parking spaces per dwelling unit (up from 1.5 spaces).
Over the years, according to the staff report, various discussions have taken place by city bodies about reviewing and changing Measure D.
"In each instance, it was decided that amendments should proceed at a later date," reads the staff report.
As a result, the Planning & Zoning Commission regularly makes parking exceptions during permitting processes for a variety of commercial and residential projects, which "adds time and expense to Planning applications. In most cases, exceptions are approved without substantive discussion."
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY CHANGES
In April 2010, the city adopted its Climate Action Plan, which "establishes a goal of reducing 4,665 metric tons of Greenhouse Gas Emissions."
This goal includes five objectives, including making it easier to walk, bike and bus around town; reduce vehicle trips; and promote pedestrian-oriented development.
The Climate Action Plan also includes several measures related to the review and possible changes related to parking in Albany.
According to the staff report, three other strategies (paid parking, permit parking and in-lieu parking fees) also "could be considered for review..."
After Tuesday's joint talk, each of the three city bodies will have parking policies agendized for future discussions.
City staff recommend that the groups meet quarterly to continue the conversation.
Do you think the city's approach to parking needs to change? Tell us in the comments. Click the "Keep me posted" button below for an alert when we publish future stories on this topic.
AGENDA
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING of the Planning & Zoning Commission, Traffic & Safety Commission, and Sustainability Committee
Date: 1/24/2012, 7:30 PM - 11:00 PM
Location: Albany City Hall - Council Chambers
1000 San Pablo Avenue
Albany, California 94706
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
For persons desiring to address the Commission on an item that is not on the agenda please note that each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. The Brown Act limits the Commission ability to take and/or discuss items that are not on the agenda; therefore, such items are normally referred to staff for comment or to a future agenda.
3. JOINT MEETING AGENDA ITEM
a. Parking Policy Discussion- As requested by the Planning & Zoning Commission at the October 25, 2011 hearing, this is a joint effort by the Commission, the Traffic & Safety Committee and Sustainability Committee to review existing parking policies. All Committees will begin discussions to amend policies within their respective purviews, for consistency with the City’s Climate Action Plan.
Recommendation: Receive the report and provide feedback to staff.
2012-1-24 PZ SR Parking Standard Discussion
Attachment 1 Transportation Strategy CAP
Attachment 2 Parking Permit Provisions
Attachment 3 Paid Parking Council Staff Report
Attachment 4 Paid Parking Report PZ 2008
4. ADJOURNMENT
The Commission/Committee/Board packet is available for public inspection at the Albany Community Center/Library, Fire Department and at Community Development Department offices at 1000 San Pablo Avenue. The agenda and supporting staff reports can be found on our web page at www.albanyca.org.
Please note that if you provide your name and address when speaking before the Commission it will become part of the official public record, which will be posted on the Internet. Agenda related writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the Community Development Department.
Rhoda Bennett
5:23 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Iif Parking Meters are put on Solono Ave. The meters will distroy the Business! Near by Cities don't have them ,El Cerrito, the Plaza,,Emerville .. Shoppers will go else where to shop for free.,El Cerrito, had Parking Meter's.Then had to remove them.The shop owners complained, great loss of Customers!.So they did a test,put bags on the meters. The Customers came back! The Meters were removed. Albany needs to , learn a lesson from El Cerrito went through. They lost revenue! If people shop else where,the Tax revenues go down!And our Property Taxes will go up!. What about the loss of Taxes from the Race Track? Isn't that enough. It's time to fight the Parking meter Battle again! Do the Business want it?. If you put Meters on Solono, Customers and Business owners,Employees,will park on the side Steets offf Solono Ave.We already don't have enough parking spots now. Then we have to park on Marin. The City will put Parking Permit's in front of our Homes..They make you pay for them. Only Streets off of Solono,. This is unfair added cost (Tax) for every Home owner off Solono Ave. It's a yeary fee! So then we have to pay to park in front of our own homes yearly. no cost now, is free. Can you afford it? Is this fair to the home owner's? All for not ,there will be fewer people shoping here.Then the Meter's will get removed and Permit signs.More Tax payer cost. Please!, do not put Parking meter's in Albany. Don't be stupid!!!!! Thank you for letting me have a voice . Rhoda Bennett
Anna
6:32 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
I work on Solano. I have to park my car on Cornell or Washington, depending on whether it's a street sweeping day, or a garbage collection day. This morning was a garbage day, all the parking spaces on Cornell were used up by garbage cans. I had to park in our business parking lot that is suppose to be for customers only. I got a parking ticket for parking there over one hour. At least it wasn't towed.
The city of Albany would make so much more money from traffic violations if they had cameras or officers "catching people badly-"making illegal left turns over a DOUBLE YELLOW LINE on a narrow-two-lane street to park grab a parking spot on the wrong side of the other side of the street. Also, those same people have the nerve to back up across the double yellow line to go in the direction they were heading in the first place. Then they go back and forth in the space trying to adjust their angle, but still leaving their vehicle in an angle where their tail end is blocking the car next to them so they can't get get back out of the space. I've witnessed lots of accidents (vs. pedestrians, bicyclists, and other vehicles).
Charging for parking on Solano and making the residents that live off of Solano will hurt Albany.
David
7:07 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
I agree that parking meters in Albany will hurt locally-owned businesses.
If the city wants to write more parking tickets, I think that automated parking enforcement vehicles that read license plates would be more efficient than the current chalking of tires and it won't discourage shoppers.
It seems that the city government is willing to bend over for big corporations (Target, Whole Foods, UC,) but they are not doing much to encourage purchasing from locally-owned businesses.
barbara gilbert
7:47 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012
I am a Berkeley resident who has increasingly paronized Albany businesses specifically because the parking is easier and less costly than in Berkeley. If you make parking more onerous in Albany business areas, I and others will have no reason to favor Albany.
Mary Lou Lorensen
6:35 am on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
I always brag to my friends that Albany does NOT have meters. I don't find much congestion on Solano. Drivers are polite, adding another point to why I like living in Albany. At least WAIT until the work on the BART line is completed. That project took MANY spaces away temporarily.
Mindi
10:47 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
The committees can say it is about the environment or reducing congestion, but I believe it is about money for the city. Who gets the money from the parking meters? The city. Who gets the revenue from the parking tickets? The city. Who gets the revenue from people paying for residential parking permits? The city. I understand the city needs revenue, especially without money that has been there in the past from the state. But just say that. Don't try to make it out as being environmental.
And what about employees at the elementary schools? Where are they supposed to park if a residential permit is instituted? Cornell doesn't have a parking lot and as far as I know, neither does Marin. Ocean View has a small one.
Paul D
1:10 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Aggressive parking meters around Grand Lake Theater - check. Avoid area.
Aggressive parking meters around Piedmont - check. Avoid area.
Aggressive parking meters around Downtown Berkeley - check. Avoid area.
Aggressive expensive parking meters around Montclair - check. Avoid area.
No parking meters in Albany -- rejoice, go shopping, go out to eat day and night, spend money, feel at ease and relaxed. I spend my money here by choice for good reasons. Will Albany recognize this or will the city's greed trounce common sense?
Does more need be said?
David
2:10 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Not that more needs to be said, but...
I was just ringing up a customer who congratulated me for still being in business after a year and a half. She said that she never stops in Berkeley anymore because the parking in Albany is so plentiful and she doesn't have to bother with the meters.
Maybe the city of Albany could do some promoting of that fact and attract more folks to shop here.
B
3:53 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012
Please--no residential parking permits, no meters. I too believe that these measures would adversely affect local businesses.
Tatter Salad
6:40 pm on Friday, January 27, 2012
There is no doubt that there would be a negative impact on Albany's commercial businesses, but worse: it will push even MORE businesses to park on residential streets, which are already over burdened by City's greed in encouraging commercial development in spite of lousy parking requirements. Expand on this? Sure
. Note new two story structures that have parking IF you negotiate a 10' wide parking access route. Also note large commercial buildings that charge their tenants to have parking, so their lot is EMPTY while side streets are crowded out (Solano and Ramona, Pamona, Key Route areas, etc. etc.).( This isn't a town ruled by citizens, or even a mayor; it's ruled by a City Manager. Don't believe me? Ask any Albany Policeman)
rob
10:11 am on Saturday, January 28, 2012
You won't find the city of Albany offering the details on how much money they lose paying for meter maids, or whatever they are called, compared to what is collected. though this is public information, this is more about cronieism than budget issues or anything else. This is just like the desperate need we have to spend hundreds of thousands on street sweepers, which is folly and corruption at its most honest. As long as we have corrupt politicians and city leaders, either via their ineptness or their self serving, we will see our community wither and drown in a sea of idiotic decisions. The best way to deter it is to boycott Solano street until this folly ends.
Brian Parsley
12:53 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Actually it took me about 10 minutes to find the information you described. In 2010, the City of paid its two part time parking enforcement officers $15,368 and $14617 respectively. That includes retirement and health care. This is found on the Bay Are News Groups public employee database.
Those officers write roughly 9000 tickets a year resulting in over $200,000 in revenue for the City.
As for street sweeping it can be best summed up by the document I found on the City's website. www.albanyca.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=185
Michael Barnes
6:01 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
Brian, thanks for the information, I checked it out. In regards to sweet sweeping, I commute to UC Berkeley every work day on my bike, and every few days I stop to remove something on the road that might end up in a car tire (maybe mine). Mostly it's construction related--sharp screws, stubby screwdrivers, box cutter blades, etc. So I'm a fan of sweep sweeping.
As for parking enforcement, the old profit maximizing rule says that we should keep hiring parking enforcement officers until the income from the last officer hired equals the amount of money they collect. Based on your numbers, we are not there yet. So the city could probably make money hiring more parking control officers. Perhaps some of this extra revenue would come at the expense of income for our businesses. How to balance all these factors is a value judgement however, not an economic one. Cheers.
Brian Parsley
6:43 pm on Saturday, January 28, 2012
I believe right now the City has hired one of the part time parking enforcement on a full time basis and the other part time officer has left. According to the City's website, they are hiring another part time officer. The job announcement is at the following: http://www.albanyca.org/index.aspx?page=1087
And Rob, it took me less than 2 minutes to find that job announcement using the City's search feature on their website. Unfortunately like many others here on Patch the facts get in the way of your preconceived notions.
Michael Barnes
8:53 am on Sunday, January 29, 2012
I grumble a lot about city politics, but not about the city website, which is excellent. It's an amazing source of information. Hat's off to whoever makes it a priority and keeps it running. Check it out, people!
Rhoda Bennett
4:26 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012
Hello. Thank you all for writing here. Please stay on top of this Parking Meter and permit parking issue. The Traffic and Saftey commision is going to be discussing ,Parking at their metting in April.(Only states" Parking ") maybe Parking Meter too?!) The Business Owner's and Employees parking Permit's are also being discussed by Council etc. .So please come to the meeting's and write letters to the City Albany Council and commisions. I think that the parking meter's were removed in El Cerrito about 1951 or so. Never brought them back.
We were in down town Livermore ,this weekend. Wonderful shoping area. Pedistrian friendly. Fountain's etc. No Parking meters.!! Free parking. Street trees ,were out in the street.Not blocking the Sidewalks .I think Albany needs better lighting on Solono, Also those flashing lights in the cross walks ,that El Cerrito has on SanPablo Ave are wonderful!!. Also Petaluma has them too.. Albany has double lined cross walk's.big No ,No!! (By Cornell). I agree with all of your responces. Thank you.Tell your neighbord and shop owener's. Sincerly,Rhoda Bennett