.
Feedback

Albany Man Arrested After Molestation Reports

Raymond Anderson, 60, was arrested Wednesday, after a police investigation that began Sunday, on suspicion of molesting two children under age 14 from 1991 to 1992. Police say they believe there may be additional witnesses or victims.

Albany resident Raymond H. Anderson was arrested earlier this week on suspicion of molestations in 1991 and 1992 involving two children who were younger than 14. 

Anderson, a life-long city resident, is well-known in the community for running neighborhood institutions such as the and Christmas tree lot. He is a current  and is involved with several business and volunteerism organizations in Albany.

said police arrested Anderson, 60, on Wednesday at about 7 p.m. on suspicion of lewd acts with a child under 14, and continuous sexual abuse of a child. 

McQuiston said the investigation began "as a child welfare investigation at Anderson's Albany residence on Sunday." 

Police said reports surfaced in the past week about two different victims who were younger than 14 when the alleged incidents happened, from 1991 to 1992.

McQuiston said police believe there may be additional victims or witnesses who have not come forward, and asked anyone with relevant information to get in touch with the police department, at 510-525-7300.

According to the Alameda County Sheriff's Department inmate locator website, Anderson was still in custody Friday. As of Friday evening, he was being held at Santa Rita Jail with a bail of $500,000, reduced from $850,000. 

According to the sheriff's department, Anderson was scheduled to be arraigned Friday at 2 p.m. at the Wiley W. Manuel courthouse in Oakland.

A representative from the Alameda County district attorney's office has not been available for comment. 

Click the "Keep me posted" button below for updates about this story. 

If there's something in this article you think , or if something else is amiss, call editor Emilie Raguso at 510-459-8325 or email at albany@patch.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Albany Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Dover February 12, 2012 at 08:06 pm
I am obviously not a lawyer but it is my understanding that the current statue of limitations can be extended based on delayed discovery.
Anonymous February 13, 2012 at 12:38 am
Tony, I'm not too familiar with what the statues are for criminal cases but I know if you want to sue someone you have a year from the time the "act" occured. Found out the hard way myself. Civil court and crminal court have two different sets of rules. Did your friend go to the police? I have a hard time believing the statue would be up after a year. Although you might believe molestation is not murder, it is not too far off. A family member of mine was molested when she was 13 and to this day she has emotional problems that have ruined her life. I was not trying to imply you were in favor of molestation, I was merly taken aback by your comment on the situation. However, after reading your reply your thoughts on this matter are alarming to me. Everybody deserves their day in court and a defense will be easy if he didn't do it. Try to show some compassion for the horrors the victim must have lived with since 1991 or 1992. I'm not trying to have a chat board argument with you, just please realize the victims may read this board and your comment showed no compassion and appeard to attempt to minimize the horrors since it went back "20 years."
Amy Smolens February 13, 2012 at 12:47 am
"Punk,"if you're going to make accusations, please have the courtesy to use your real name. Thanks.
Ross Stapleton-Gray February 13, 2012 at 01:27 am
Not to be all Captain Pedant, but the phrase is "statute of limitations." Arguably, given a presumption of innocence, the defense is in a better position for having a long time passed... it's up to the prosecution to present evidence of a crime, and the defense would only need establish an alibi if that were seen as sufficient and credible.
Dover February 13, 2012 at 02:22 am
I freely admit that my crappy spelling kept me out of law school.
I guess I should just stick to cut and paste? "Penal Code section 803 (f) allows the prosecution to file a criminal complaint within one year of the date of a report to a California law enforcement agency by a person of any age alleging that he or she, while under the age of 18 years, was the victim of a crime described in Section 261, 286, 288, 288a, 288.5, or 289, or Section 289.5, as enacted by Chapter 293 of the Statutes of 1991 relating to penetration by an unknown object. This law applies only if all of the following occur: (A) The limitation period specified in Section 800, 801, or 801.1, whichever is later, has expired. (B) The crime involved substantial sexual conduct, as described in subdivision (b) of Section 1203.066, excluding masturbation that is not mutual. (C) There is independent evidence that corroborates the victim's allegation. If the victim was 21 years of age or older at the time of the report, the independent evidence shall clearly and convincingly corroborate the victim's allegation."
Tim Q. Cannon February 13, 2012 at 04:50 pm
this is one of the worst accusations that can happen to a person, and one of the worst things that can happen to a victim. I hope proper resolution takes place for all concerned.
John Finnagan February 16, 2012 at 04:44 am
Molesting a child is as bad as raping a woman. Both are cunning acts of aggression that scar the victim for life. If he is guilty of the charges may God have mercy on his soul.
Susan Miller February 16, 2012 at 12:05 pm
Molestation murders a childhood and changes lives forever. Ayone who is insensitive to the lifelong harm done should put in some study time. It will change the student forever as well.
Susan Miller February 16, 2012 at 12:10 pm
Worse. And please do not forget it happens to boys as well. An assualt like this in childhood can skew the sexual expression of adult. What happened to Mr. Anderson that influenced his behavior?
Emilie Raguso February 16, 2012 at 12:40 pm
I appreciate people weighing in and I know this is a very emotional topic, but let's remember that this is all in the very early stages and certainly no guilt has been adjudicated. I don't think we can yet say anything about Mr. Anderson's behavior in this regard.
Susan Miller February 16, 2012 at 01:26 pm
Ms. Raguso is right and fair. Mr Anderson is innocent until guilt is proven, and that is from Napoleonic Law that we had the good sense to change from "Guilty until proven innocent".
In our courts system the truth is not always found, just who has the more skillful attorney. If there is no basis to find Mr.Anderson guilty of the charges I would not envy him when he makes a re-entry to his community because this is one muddy spot that is hard to wash off. Compassion is needed.
Dover February 16, 2012 at 01:55 pm
Emilie, do we know anything more about the facts? Does he have an attorney? Why was the arraignment postponed twice? Has he tried to make bail? He has so many friends in this town, it's hard to believe that he doesn't have more visible and vocal support in his corner.
Tony Caine February 16, 2012 at 02:44 pm
The horror and repulsion around molestation is mainly a societal construct not something in our genes. It is similar to the repulsion society expressed toward homosexual activity prior to 1980 or so. In Roman times it was actually considered normal activity. If we viewed it legally and socially as a form of assault without all the baggage we now attach, the victims in many cases would not suffer the same degree of lifelong trauma and shame that they do today. A lot of their trauma is the sense of shame we communicate to them for being part of the act.
Tod Abbott February 16, 2012 at 03:00 pm
Dover, you are absolutely correct. Ray has many supporters in this community. However, this is a very emotional topic, and cannot be commented upon lightly. Without any facts on either side, ANY overt defense of Ray would likely inflame debate. Despite the best intentions, it's not clear there is a way to speak up in Ray's defense at this point without appearing to be blaming the alleged victims, or downplaying the alleged crimes.
All we can do is call for level heads and patience while the investigation continues. So please do not take the muted response from Ray's friends as anything other than an indication of the few facts that are known, and the very sensitive nature of the situation.
Dover February 16, 2012 at 03:52 pm
Bailing him out quietly would be an excellent way to demonstrate one's support without worry of inflamed debate on Patch.
The fact that he is still sitting in the hellhole known as Santa Rita Jail tells me much more about his friends and supporters than your carefully chosen words.
Martha H February 17, 2012 at 01:24 am
WHAT?!?!?!?!
"The horror and repulsion around molestation is mainly a societal construct" Are you serious??? "A lot of their trauma is the sense of shame we communicate to them for being part of the act." I'm pretty sure their trauma is from being a VICTIM OF MOLESTATION. You have one truly twisted view of things. Pedophiles and child molesters are the problem. Period.
Emilie Raguso February 17, 2012 at 01:33 am
@Dover: When I spoke to the DA's office Tuesday, there wasn't even a docket number assigned. It's hard to get information because it's all through a spokesperson who has a caseload herself. There's no direct access to attorneys until there's a hearing, and I haven't gone to any of the dates so far... But, as a result, I don't know yet who his attorney is. I will definitely keep on top of it but I don't know that the information will come quickly. Posted the latest story here (http://patch.com/A-qRPl) but there wasn't a whole lot to add.
Susan Miller February 17, 2012 at 02:38 am
There is a BIG difference between homosexual activity between consenting adults and adults or between children and children, and sexual cohersion of children by predatory adults. I am not talking about the 19 year old man wth the 17 year old girlfriend; I'm using the example of the 40 year old man in predatory mode with a six year old CHILD in his sites. To equate homosexuality, a normal mode of behavior in my mind thart occurs in all higher animal species, to the child molestor's predatory behavior for self gratification is offensive and wrong. I wonder where your standards come from and why you dismiss this behavior so lightly. Children may not give consent. It is the law. Our failure to protect them is a reflection on our legal system even if it was 20 or 50 years ago.
Kit Harbinger February 19, 2012 at 04:44 pm
I do know someone who was wrongly accused and his life was destroyed financially and in just about every other way. Forever. So let's respect the law and our system of justice and consider Ray innocent until proven guilty. Child molestation is a heinous crime but let's not jump to conclusions. If they can find him guilty, don't worry, they will.
Emilie Raguso February 22, 2012 at 07:45 pm
From the district attorney's office: Ray Anderson's scheduled appearance Tuesday was continued until Feb. 27. "No plea was entered. And according to our records, the defendant is being represented by a public defender."
Emilie Raguso February 22, 2012 at 09:52 pm
Also, from the police: "The case is charged at this point for counts against our known victims. Should additional people come forward claiming to be victims, we will investigate those allegations and, if evidence exists to support the allegations, we can request the DDA amend the case with additional charges for newly identified victims."
Tony Caine February 24, 2012 at 04:26 pm
From the replies there is obviously a lot of miscommunication here. My reference to homosexual conduct was to make the point that our attitudes about what is repugnant or disgusting where sex is concerned are quite arbitrary and can change considerably with the passage of time. I clearly said molestation should be a criminal offense. The non-arbitrary part of a molester's offense in my opinion is the abuse of trust and authority of adults vs. children. The most healing response from victims should be anger. Repugnance or disgust reactions on the part of the victims lead to self loathing and are harder to treat. Repugnance or disgust from adults warps judgment and leads to irrational analysis of facts when it comes to trials and enforcement. It leads to witch hunt atmospheres. Also treating the perpetrators in non-rational ways makes them more defensive and unreachable. This is why I think the emphasis should be on the rational aspects of abuse rather than the parts which are based on arbitrary sexual standards.
Maybe we also have different definitions of molestation. I think of forceable activity on children as rape not molestation. I think of molestation as something where the minor is convinced or cajoled into doing something. I never said that I had no queasy and repugnant feelings myself. I do. I grew up in this society and absorbed the same mores as everyone else. This doesn't prevent me from stepping back and looking at how the situation might be improved.
Susan Miller February 25, 2012 at 04:49 am
I am commenting on your statement"molestation as something where the minor is convinced or cajoled into doing something."
The standard mode of behavior for predators of children is to weaken their resistance over time and seduce them into acts that they are forbidden to consent to by law. There is no circumstance I can think of that allows adults to engage in sexual activity with a child. The mental and physical damage is too great to allow it at any time in any form. Predators justify their activities in many ways, but at base it is not allowed. Children, by their nature, are at the mercy of adults because they trust them to nurture, not harm. A child may comply, but that in no way excuses the adult's behavior.
Emilie Raguso February 28, 2012 at 08:34 am
It appears from the "inmate locator" that the case is (once again) set for attorney and plea on March 2.
no name February 28, 2012 at 06:27 pm
I know what it's like to be the parent of children who have been molested. I also know the damage that can be done when someone is wrongly accused. I ask that everyone sit back and wait to see what the actual evidence is and ask "why so long". I know that I may get some nasty responses back and, if Ray is guilty, he is where he belongs.....but I personally don't think he is guilty and I ask everyone not to judge before Ray has his day in court.
Dover March 5, 2012 at 07:13 pm
Update: After a multitude of postponements (6 or 7 that I know of) Ray was again scheduled to enter a plea this morning. He did not leave the jail and it appears that he is now in the Santa Rita Infirmary.
I know he has diabetes. I also know that the food in SRJ is not designed for healthy people, let alone the chronically ill. Odd as might sound, he is actually lucky to have made it into the infirmary. Many inmates suffer without any medical assistance.
Dover March 7, 2012 at 01:53 am
Ray is now out of the SRJ Infirmary and was once again scheduled to enter a plea this morning but it doesn't look like that happened as the Inmate Locator has not yet shown an update.
His many friends have still not made any attempt to bail him out and considering the exact nature of the charges, it doesn't look too good for the future either.
Dover March 16, 2012 at 04:50 pm
Update: Ray is (once again) scheduled to enter a plea on Monday, March 19th, 9 am, Department 112, W.W. Manuel Courthouse, downtown Oakland.
His dear (and oddly quiet) friends at the Lions Club have still not supplied an attorney so he is at the mercy of the Public Defender's office as well as the slowpokes who test DNA for the County.
El Payong April 20, 2012 at 08:04 pm
I Don't know this Ray personally but have seen him numerous times around my nieghborhood. He apparently had rented a house under his name but let others reside in it. What a great deed a person can do. On the other hand, I've seen him come and go from this residence with small children in tow that lived there with no car seat whatsover and he's supposed to be a Traffic & Safety Commish. Not gonna Judge but I hope & Pray that those children were not a victim of his Accusations.
Emilie Raguso September 27, 2012 at 07:47 am
There's a new hearing scheduled for this case Friday. We've been told the defense attorney is trying to get the case dismissed. Story coming Friday.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Amy Smolens June 7, 2013 at 02:57 pm
Hi there - This doesn't seem like an appropriate announcement for Albany or Berkeley Patch. 1) theRead More category is Announcements/Around Town and these events are all in Marin 2) Patch's "Terms of Use" say "You may use this Service solely for personal and non-commercial purposes. That is to say: You can’t use the Service to make a living unless you enter into a separate agreement with us that says you can." This is clearly solely a commercial venture, not a neighbor of ours or local organization providing a community service and charging for the service. 3) I went to the Novato website and saw this listing: "Ettiquette (sic) Series for Kids - 17737 Ages: 7 Years to 11 Years - Residents $150.00 - Non-residents $163.00" 4) These items push our items of local interest down and out of sight. Especially now that there is no box indicating the stories with the most recent comments, as there used to be on the Patch front page, out of sight does mean out of mind. Charles, what are your thoughts here? Thanks.
angie allison June 7, 2013 at 03:45 pm
Hi Amy, Thank you for letting me know and I understand! Angie
Mechanics from Street Level Cycles tune up bikes at the Albany Arts & Green Festival. Photo courtesy Matt McHugh
Lin B. June 6, 2013 at 11:29 am
I've been waiting for the right time to donate my son's old bike he used in middle/high school. It'sRead More been hanging on hooks in the garage and this seems like a great time to give it up!
christopher papazoglow June 7, 2013 at 10:30 am
Can you please post their hours / days of operation ? As i recall, they're only open afternoons aRead More few days a week, and it won't do to just leave donations outside ( they'll be scavenged ). And i was not able to find the info online.
AS&R - Albany Strollers & Rollers June 7, 2013 at 11:20 am
Thanks, Christopher. Open Community Hours are Friday, Saturday, Sunday 12-6pm so anytime those daysRead More are definitely fine. They're there (84 Bolivar Drive - Aquatic Park) most of the day Wednesdays and Thursdays for Youth Classes and the doors are locked. I just spoke to Amber Rich and she asked you to call them at 510 644 2577 and let them know what time is good for you and they will be sure to be there. Thanks for your generosity!
Dover June 5, 2013 at 02:47 pm
Thanks for the update but I am worried. This is very distressing. How will Eric and Tarina be ableRead More to afford their annual lengthy hipster vacation if they have to cough up lawyer fees? I am sure they were expecting that UCB (aka the rest of us) would pay Mr. Siegel's bill. Now they may have to resort to staying home and eating Top Ramen out of their charming and cheerful "made in Asia by small children but they're not slaving for 14 hours a day in front of our faces so we don't care" ceramic bowls. Oh noes! Bad, bad, very, very bad news.
Charles Burress (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 03:06 pm
David, thanks for the alert to the judge's decision.
Preston Jordan June 9, 2013 at 12:42 pm
Thanks for the comments Erika, Robert and Al. I am kind of amazed to read "Max's owners do notRead More think that the increased business would be worth the hassle." Yes, the customer base may change, but aren't total sales the goal? Regarding the 18 stop, there is discussion of moving it around the corner as part of this change. Even if it does not move around the corner, reducing the number of buses stopping on the south side of Solano would improve traffic flow according to the traffic consultant. Commissioner Javandel, who is also a traffic engineer and head of Berkeley's Transportation Division, agreed and voted for included shifting the stop north in the San Pablo plan. A stop to the north would allow motorists turning right onto Solano to do so more easily, which would reduce congestion and be good for business. It would also result in some of the time the bus is stopping occurring during a red on San Pablo anyway. Al, I think your concern about motorists stopping in a northern bus stop potentially causing problems not only for San Pablo but also for Solano is a good one. If I attend another meeting concerning the San Pablo plan, I will raise this point.
Erika Lockhart June 9, 2013 at 01:51 pm
I guess it is a done deal and Max's doesn't have the petition out any longer. It is interesting toRead More me that the people who profess to be in favor of Albany's being a walking city use traffic concerns to support their points. There is a restaurant on the south side of Solano, somewhere people may be for hours and may be willing to drive around for a parking spot, and a "liquor store", which also provides all kinds of other things one might need in a quick stop, where people will be for minutes. With the green zone there, there is quick turnaround. And, there seems to be some blind spot about business that might be lost if those parking spaces are lost. I drive there and spend $10-$50. Are the bus stop people going to be spending so much? As one commenter said, they survived before, they will survived before. The unsaid thing is "even if beaten down". That's just my opinion! I realize I'm spitting in the wind here but it seems to me that this change did not engage enough people for a fair decision. Then again, I'm new here, not "plugged in", and if no one else thinks the way I do, perhaps I should move somewhere else.
Robert Marshall June 9, 2013 at 09:55 pm
I went into Max's on Friday and asked about the petition. They have it behind the counter. As ofRead More when I saw it, there were something like 130 signatures. As for moving the AC Transit 18 stop around the corner?? How many of the very much in demand parking spaces will be lost by doing that?