.
Feedback

Gill Tract Science Promotes Food Stability, Say Researchers

Scientists study plant genetics and sustainable agriculture at the Gill Tract site, which has been taken over by farming activists. Click the "Keep me posted" button below this story for an update when we cover this topic.

The land near San Pablo and Marin avenues was not unused—it was just waiting for spring planting by a group of researchers, several of whom study plant genetics and another, Miguel Altieri, who studies what many call sustainable agriculture.

The five scientists come from both the University of California at Berkeley and the Plant Gene Expression Center in the on Buchanan Street.

Berkeley Professor Altieri is out of the country on research, and couldn’t be reached for an interview. His website describes his work as agroecology: using modern ecological research methods to study traditional farming to design sustainable farming systems.

A video on YouTube, “Why is agroecology the solution to hunger and food scarcity?” captures the Altieri’s message: “We know one thing for sure – it is that industrial agriculture already failed to feed the world. We have 1 billion people that are starving. In addition to that, the ecological costs of industrial agriculture are huge,” he says.

His group’s research, according to his website, “provides the basic ecological principles for how to study, design and manage sustainable agroecosystems that are both productive and natural-resource conserving, and that are also culturally sensitive, socially just and economically viable.”

At the Gill Tract, Altieri’s group has been studying disease in dry-farmed tomatoes, and pest control from intercropping broccoli with other plants.

In short, Altieri’s work is about food stability—one goal of the occupying group. And, in fact, Anya Kamenskaya of the group Occupy the Farm, who is a former student of Altieri's, told reporters Monday that the group has not touched Altieri’s cover crop of fava beans.

The land the group is is the surrounding cornfield, because, Kamenskaya said, the benefits of corn research—which does not result in an edible crop—don’t go directly to the community, the way food could. She said this research could be done elsewhere.

RESEARCHER: "PURE SCIENCE" CONTRIBUTES, TOO

is one of four scientists who studies maize (corn to the rest of us) at the Gill Tract. Although her genetic research is pure science, not applied like Altieri’s, she said she feels that it, too, contributes to food stability.

“If we understand the basic process of the plant biology, we’re in a better place to breed for crops that can withstand changing climates, and that will provide food security,” Hake said.

Hake said maize is used for research for several reasons. The chromosomes are large, and more easily seen. Also, the male and female flowers are separated, so it’s easy to crossbreed. And finally, there are huge variations in maize.

Hake, who has been working at the Gill Tract site for 30 years, explained that the researchers’ work is not to create new products (such as in genetic engineering). “We’re trying to understand basic processes in plant biology.”

The other researchers who share maize acreage with Hake are Zac Cande who studies meiosis, Frank Harmon, who is studying the circadian rhythms of plants, and , whose work on the immune system of maize was in 2010.

Asked whether the corn grown for research could be eaten, Hake said no, for several reasons. First, the kernels (seeds) must be saved for replanting. (Genetics studies are based on following generations of a species.) And second, the corn—not sweet corn, but the hard type ground for cornmeal—is of inferior eating quality to what a farmer would raise.

For now, the occupiers are not in the way of her research, she said. Her corn is planted in June. Normally the winter weeds would be mowed down soon and the field prepared in May, she said.

“If these people mow down all the weeds and till it, maybe they’ll get it ready for us,” Hake said cheerfully.

Lisch, on the other hand, was not so optimistic.

He replied to a Patch inquiry: “All of us do basic research that is paid for by federal research grants. We don't grow GMOs at Gill, and we really don't appreciate our planting season being threatened because they want to make a political point.”

AN OPEN DIALOGUE WITH ACTIVISTS

Lisch attended a community meeting Monday night with Gill Tract activists, where he shared concerns about his upcoming planting season. He said he's for about 20 years, planting one seed at a time, weeding by hand and covering the crop carefully to protect it from crows and deer. Then comes the process of watching the corn grow and crossing it to study the outcome.

"It's not our land, but it feels very much like it was your backyard and someone came into it and said, 'We're not leaving,'" he said Monday evening. Lisch, an Albany resident, said he uses about a quarter-acre, or 20 rows, for his genetic research.

A number of activists approached Lisch after he spoke to the group to ask him about his work and his plans, and whether it might be possible to find a common goal. 

"We might just be collateral damage," he said to one of them, in reference to his fellow researchers. "If the field isn't ready by June 1, I can't plant. I have a grant and I may need to tell them I can't plant, so I can't do my research."

Ultimately, he said he appreciated being able to have an open dialogue with the activists, despite their differences.

"They're not bad people," he said. "They're just good people on my land." 

Click the "Keep me posted" button below for an update when we publish future stories on this topic. Read more here. Learn about the proposed .

Additional reporting to this story was contributed by Emilie Raguso.

If there's something in this article you think  , or if something else is amiss, call editor Emilie Raguso at 510-459-8325 or email her at albany@patch.com.

Dawn April 24, 2012 at 12:56 pm
Unlike what another poster said, there IS a plan for water delivery. In fact, it's Albany community members who volunteered to help them with their plan. Whatever you think about these planters and their plan, they are not dumb people.
It's the assumptions on both sides that drive me crazy! It's easy to sit at our computers at home and spew opinions when we have few details about what's going on. I appreciate Emilie (and others) going out there to find out what's going on. At the very least, I appreciate that this action may open up dialogue about UC's impact on Albany, which seems to be talked about very little. They build family housing that leaves our city left to pay for educating their students' children, and what do we get for it? They don't pay taxes to us. They won't even guarantee us the baseball fields unless we agree to their Whole Foods plan, and even then, it's only for 10 years. It would be one thing if CAL was still providing affordable education for its students, but it's not.
Winifred Owen April 24, 2012 at 01:05 pm
LOL! And how about the half-grown plants from plastic trays they stuck into the ground. Now THAT's real farming, folks. These are a bunch of poseurs and out-of-towners, who have descended to test the waters here. Let's show 'em the door.
Kevin Johnson April 24, 2012 at 01:06 pm
Breaking and entering to create dialog, great...
Amy Marsh April 24, 2012 at 01:30 pm
Hi Dawn, I was out there three different times yesterday to find out what was going on. I was at the morning meeting and during that meeting I saw the need for some immediate action - and so offered to go over with a couple of representatives to open channels of communication with the AUSD and Ocean View Elementary School - because there were bound to be parental concerns about what was going on. Then again I was back at two other times during the day.
Kevin - I say "mean spirited" because the farmers were told UCB would be meeting with them at 2 PM yesterday, but representatives didn't come talk before turning off the tap. Dawn, you make a good-point. I am thinking of the words of the late Michael Rossman, science teacher, Free Speech Movement veteran, and collector of the famed AOUON political poster archives. See Free Speech, Free Spirit - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yzoQvbjr0w) My contention is that relationships need to be cultivated as well as the land. I think there's been a lot of brilliant planning in this action - but I also think that paying attention to relationships - with all their complexity - is the only way anything sustainable can really happen. In my case, reading about Damon Lisch's predicament has caused me to re-feel and rethink some of my support for the Occupy action.
Kevin Johnson April 24, 2012 at 01:36 pm
Amy, UCB aren't required to talk to them, they represent themselves and their own interests, not the interests of the all of the Albany community ( I live down the street and no one asked me if it was ok to break into a property to protect my community's interest). This may feel good but what they did was against the law, no matter how harmless it seems.
Peggy McQuaid April 24, 2012 at 01:39 pm
There are several (albeit it disjointed) facts that are important to remember:
UC provided FREE fields to Albany LIttle League for the past 50 years. I am not sure there would be ALL without the University. Albany elected officials, appointed commissioners, citizens and staff have spent 5 years working WITH the University on the mixed development project. Personally, I am unable/unwilling to attend any meeting or event that is held on private property without an invitation from the property owner. I am interested in the business plan for this farm, how has the financing been arranged, has a long range work schedule been created, how will the food be distributed, how will it be determined who will get the food, at what price (if any) how will any profit be used, will the farm be certified organic, who will take care of that, are there health permits required, who will take care of that, how will people learn when food is ready for distribution? who will distribute it?
Copper Hat April 24, 2012 at 02:12 pm
Great points, Peggy.
David April 24, 2012 at 02:32 pm
Go to tonight's Planning and Zoning meeting to express your opinions about the UC Village project.
I have heard from others, and experienced myself, that valid criticism about specific problems are not acknowledged, nor addressed by the city. But, if more than a tiny number of people actually show up, the city may actually realize that addressing these issues now will be more prudent than defending a lawsuit that is sure to follow. My opposition to the project is the size and it's lack of service to the community. If they included something like a food bank or assistance center for the needy, I'd be more inclined to overlook the negative impact of the disproportionally large development. We are the <1% (of people, who comment on the Patch and speak at meetings.) Bring your friends and neighbors. Maybe the Occupy Farm will result in more attendance at the meetings. Regarding ALL - UC has not paid property taxes on the land and the village children attend Albany schools (and can play little league,) so it's not like UC, a public university, is some magnanimous corporation. I think UC village is a great little community, and Albany deserves a great little natural foods store. I'd be willing to open a 15,000 sf store there.
Albany Mom April 24, 2012 at 06:12 pm
I'll first say that while I do not support a lengthy occupation of the Gill Tract, I appreciate how this recent action has increased the dialogue about the future development of the property. I suspect that the attendance at tonight's planning and zoning meeting will be significantly higher as a result.
Now I hope that the Occupy the Farm members will start working on a quick exit strategy if they don't already have one. This article, in particular, raised some red flags for me. When activists play judge and jury about which Gill Tract research is worth protecting, they risk alienating people who might otherwise be sympathetic to their cause. Anya Kamenskaya is free to believe that "the benefits of corn research don’t go directly to the community," but I'm troubled that she and other activists feel like they have the right to seize the plots of researchers whose work they do not like or value. It would be arrogant and presumptuous for me to think that I could determine the importance of a research project with questions about whether the crop is maize or whether the food is edible. I believe that we need to support alternatives to industrial agriculture, but I do not think this is the way to do it.
Frank Knowles April 24, 2012 at 08:40 pm
A few clarifications about the ALL-UC relationship and a little history about the ballfields: Baseball has been played on that site since at WWII when the shipyard workers living in the surrounding barracks cleared the space and created a baseball diamond. They called it Victory Field. ALL was founded in 1956, the same year that UC bought the old barracks and began turning it into student housing, and began play on Victory Field with a rent-free handshake agreement with the University. Since then, ALL has maintained those fields at its own expense. (The old Victory Field was split into two smaller Little League-size fields, North & South, and a third T-Ball-sized field, East Field). North Field was renamed Victory Field about 4 years ago in honor of the original Victory Field.) All that you see there (beautiful grass fields, dugouts, fences, batting cages, etc.) was built, rebuilt, and maintained at ALL's expense. UC contributes the land and water, ALL contributes the money and manpower, and both enjoy some of the best baseball fields in the East Bay.
birdie April 24, 2012 at 08:41 pm
Thank you Patch for an excellent article providing the Albany community with some much-needed facts about the agricultural land portion of the Gill Tract. Going past the Tract I have often wondered about the nature of the research going on there. Food security and sustainability are very real and critical issues and are deserving of research. I'm heartened that the researchers have grants in these areas and that their work is being carried out here in Albany. The political theater being acted out on the property is jeopardizing this research and undermining the very goals the protesters say they want to advance. While I support the goal of an urban farm on the property (one that would hopefully provide some segment of land for continued research as well) I can't support this occupation. This land is not under imminent threat. Now the sustainable food research is. What a shame.
Sarah Hake April 25, 2012 at 12:12 am
As one of the researchers, I appreciate this venue for discussion. I have had corn in this field for 30 years, and love the fact that we (myself and students) can ride our bikes to the field. Every summer, I have 5-8 undergrads and some high school students help organize seed, plant, net (to protect against the crows), observe and document the genetic variations and carry out pollinations. While I believe the basic science is valuable, teaching observational and scientific skills to students is even more important. I am also a strong proponent of urban gardens and we started a small one in front of the USDA building. I think there is a place for everything. This field is used for research - it is only idle in the winter as the days are short and the soil temperature cold. I think the gardening should happen in other locations.
Sarah Hake
Lisa Schneider April 25, 2012 at 01:40 am
About urban gardening: I grow herbs, fruits and vegetables in my back 40 square feet. I support creative & cooperative use of neglected plots-- with the community and land owners participating. But/And, let's keep thinking about the most environmentally effective use of land. Here's a "Freakonomics" perspective on locavore farming in urban areas: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/23/freakonomics-eatinglocal_n_1441937.html
Frank Harmon April 25, 2012 at 02:46 am
I'm a colleague of Sarah Hake and also a researcher who relies on the Gill tract for my lab's summer research. Like all the labs that use the Gill tract, we have a strong teaching component accompanying our research. Not only do volunteer and paid undergraduates from UC Berkeley participate, we also host community college interns from across the Bay Area as part of a UC Berkeley program to encourage first-in-family and socioeconomically disadvantaged students to pursue careers in science. The students are not simply there for manual labor, but are active participants in all aspects of our research. If this group continues to hold the Gill tract, our students will be denied this valuable learning experience.
Frank Harmon
Peggy McQuaid April 25, 2012 at 03:36 am
Thank you to Ms. Hake and Mr. Harmon for sharing their work through their comments. You are providing a wonderful educational opportunity for so many students.
Damon Lisch April 25, 2012 at 09:09 am
Yes, I had failed to mention that when I visited the activist the other day, and it's a very important part of what we do. One of my favorite things to do with my students is to have them spend time walking the field and finding variation. What's different and why? It makes them really look at the plants as they grow, and really think about how they develop over time. Cross pollination of the corn, which takes place later in the summer, makes them think about the effects of temperature and light on flowering. When you're pollinating you are working on the corn's schedule, not yours, which means you have to walk the field every day, carefully observing every plant to see whether it is ready for crossing. It's hard work, but it's also absorbing and gratifying to work so closely with a plant as it develops. Sharing that experience with students, and helping them to think carefully about science as they work in the field, is one of my favorite parts of my job. I know from talking to a lot of people that science means something scary, corporate and alienating, but that has nothing to do with what we do. Our work is paid for by you through your tax dollars (mostly through the National Science Foundation and the USDA), and the results of our research are available to everyone. As long as these occupiers sit on our field, we can't teach or make new discoveries, and that doesn't seem right to me.
Karl Haro von Mogel April 25, 2012 at 05:57 pm
I am deeply troubled that the Occupy the Farm group has decided that certain kinds of basic plant genetics and agricultural science research are not fit to continue, in a stunning display of ignorance. That they are choosing to preserve and protect the research conducted by a former adviser to one of the members of the group is also troubling. I'll bet that Miguel Altieri, if he did not know about this event before it started, is thinking right now about whether he should stand with his colleagues and fellow scientists, or his former student? If the collegiality of the university faculty community is to be preserved - it would have to be the former. The latter would be disgraceful.
Eric Chou April 25, 2012 at 06:04 pm
Bear in mind this actually comes from a far left leaning liberal, but the Occupiers need to leave. While the underlying intention to raise awareness and generate discussion (I'm surmising) is positive, any extended occupation of this private land that threatens the University's funded research and academic work can and should not be condoned. The fact that the University's research on this site pursues many of the same sustainable agriculture goals that the occupiers claim to support makes their actions that much more questionable, troubling and, increasingly so, illegitimate.
John Kindle April 25, 2012 at 06:18 pm
a little of my observed Albany/Berkeley Turkey history.
Part 1-The first observed urban turkey flock in this area was a small flock around Codonices Park established by Tilden Park Turkeys. This flock had an established route around the area. Early morning, area of North Berkeley Library. Late morning, area of Albany Library (I guess these early turkeys were literary turkeys). Late afternoon they hit the area of the Edible School Yard. They found out these were wild turkeys the day they locked one up in their chicken coop thinking it was a lost pet. I believe our Albany turkeys are an off shoot of this flock. The Gill Track turkeys were compromised on a tom and 2 hens, along with their offspring of the last 2 years. Sadly on of the hens was found ill at a home remodel in the area of Solano and Ramona. As far as I know this is the only adult turkey fatality that has happened in Albany.
John Kindle April 25, 2012 at 06:20 pm
a little of my observed Albany/Berkeley Turkey history.
Part 2- I believe the turkeys you saw near Berkeley City Hall are an offshoot from a flock that was established near the area of Willard Park a couple years after the Codonices Park flock was established. I'm not sure if the Gill Track turkey are the same turkeys that have been seen on Albany Hill. I the last few years is seem the Albany/Berkeley turkey flocks have not been roaming as much as the original Codonices Park flock. One thing I do know is that the during the winter smaller turkey flock in an area will at times join into one big flock. I have observed a flock of over 100 turkeys while camping at Pinnacles National Monument during the winter. By the way, I would have loved to have seen you observation of the interaction of the turkeys and the geese. One time I saw a Tom single handily drive of a small heard of deer so his hens could eat the acorns they had been eating.
brian April 26, 2012 at 06:57 pm
Winfred....those 'half grown plants' are called 'starts' - they were planted by seed and set in a greenhouse during the winter so they'd be ready for plant. Obviously you don't know your farming or what you're talking about.
Kevin - Albany Bulb isn't class 1 soil that's up for development. Albany Bulb is an old trash landfill...The reason the Gill Tract was picked is because of it's pristine soil that is about to be destroyed by development.
brian April 26, 2012 at 07:00 pm
Well guess what would happen if people didn't have some civil disobedience once in a while to make a point. Rosa Parks would still be standing on the bus. Just because it's the law doesn't always mean it's right, history has shown us this over and over and over.
I think developing over the LAST piece of class 1 soil should be against the law and that soil/land should be protected. If these activists didn't have the boldness for this action it would be 'business as usual' and this lot would be developed on.
brian April 26, 2012 at 07:04 pm
I really appreciate hearing comments like this. Even though you don't agree with their actions you're still open minded and are neutrally voicing your concerns. Thank you.
I agree that all considerations - researchers, UCB, activists, and residents - need to be taken into consideration during this process. I've been to a few of the meetings on the farm and they have said it many many times over that they in no way plan on staying on the land, and in fact, don't want to be staying over night. They are however doing this because if they leave overnight it will most likely get them locked out. Long term, they do not at all plan on wanting to stay there.
Michael Barnes April 26, 2012 at 07:11 pm
While we are on the issue of assumptions, your assumption about "educating their students' children" is flatly incorrect. AUSD gets the same amount of money per child from the state regardless of where they live. It is correct that families living in university housing don't pay parcel taxes, but the university has provided other things for the sake of all of Albany's kids, including close cooperation with Albany little league and the Albany children's center. Residents of university housing also help support local businesses that do pay parcel taxes, so they contribute indirectly in that manner.
You are also incorrect in your assumption that Cal no longer provides affordable education. What Cal has done is to increase the number of out-of-state students who pay full tuition and use the money to provide financial aid to lower- and now middle-income students. Not a perfect solution, but it's a good one considering how much the legislature has cut finding to whole UC system over last several years.
Emilie Raguso April 26, 2012 at 10:27 pm
Speaking of turkeys and chickens....
http://albany.patch.com/blog_posts/gill-tract-turkeys-vs-chickens-in-an-suv
John Kindle April 27, 2012 at 03:05 am
One time I saw a tom turkey single handily drive off a herd of deer. To bad they can't do the same to the squatters. i guess we need to contact UCPD:
Non-Emergency (510) 642-6760 police@berkeley.edu Mitchell J. Celaya III, Chief of Police (510) 642-1133 mjc@berkeley.edu Jennifer Woods, Executive Assistant (510) 643-7500 jwoods@berkeley.edu
Laurence Schechtman April 28, 2012 at 04:33 am
Hi Amy,
Right you are. There should be co-existence between the researchers and the urban community farmers.
Peggy McQuaid April 28, 2012 at 11:29 am
It is time for one more question, - what is your exit strategy?
Peggy McQuaid April 28, 2012 at 11:33 am
Thank you also Dr. Lisch for your posts explaining exactly what is grown on the Gill Tract and all of the facets of your work. I appreciate your patience during what must be an extremely frustrating time for you.
Adam Merberg April 28, 2012 at 09:51 pm
I agree with this comment. And Altieri has apparently sided with the occupiers, joining them to teach a workshop on agroecology earlier today.
To me what is most baffling about the situation is why the farmers have chosen to occupy the land used for research instead of the land that has been slated for the development that they are protesting. I briefly thought that the land might not be suitable for planting, but in another media account (SF Chronicle), they were said to have described all of the land as "pristine." Perhaps it is overly cynical to see the choice of plots as a deliberate attempt to antagonize the genetics researchers, but I'm at a loss for other explanations.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Albany Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Amy Smolens June 7, 2013 at 02:57 pm
Hi there - This doesn't seem like an appropriate announcement for Albany or Berkeley Patch. 1) theRead More category is Announcements/Around Town and these events are all in Marin 2) Patch's "Terms of Use" say "You may use this Service solely for personal and non-commercial purposes. That is to say: You can’t use the Service to make a living unless you enter into a separate agreement with us that says you can." This is clearly solely a commercial venture, not a neighbor of ours or local organization providing a community service and charging for the service. 3) I went to the Novato website and saw this listing: "Ettiquette (sic) Series for Kids - 17737 Ages: 7 Years to 11 Years - Residents $150.00 - Non-residents $163.00" 4) These items push our items of local interest down and out of sight. Especially now that there is no box indicating the stories with the most recent comments, as there used to be on the Patch front page, out of sight does mean out of mind. Charles, what are your thoughts here? Thanks.
angie allison June 7, 2013 at 03:45 pm
Hi Amy, Thank you for letting me know and I understand! Angie
Mechanics from Street Level Cycles tune up bikes at the Albany Arts & Green Festival. Photo courtesy Matt McHugh
Lin B. June 6, 2013 at 11:29 am
I've been waiting for the right time to donate my son's old bike he used in middle/high school. It'sRead More been hanging on hooks in the garage and this seems like a great time to give it up!
christopher papazoglow June 7, 2013 at 10:30 am
Can you please post their hours / days of operation ? As i recall, they're only open afternoons aRead More few days a week, and it won't do to just leave donations outside ( they'll be scavenged ). And i was not able to find the info online.
AS&R - Albany Strollers & Rollers June 7, 2013 at 11:20 am
Thanks, Christopher. Open Community Hours are Friday, Saturday, Sunday 12-6pm so anytime those daysRead More are definitely fine. They're there (84 Bolivar Drive - Aquatic Park) most of the day Wednesdays and Thursdays for Youth Classes and the doors are locked. I just spoke to Amber Rich and she asked you to call them at 510 644 2577 and let them know what time is good for you and they will be sure to be there. Thanks for your generosity!
Dover June 5, 2013 at 02:47 pm
Thanks for the update but I am worried. This is very distressing. How will Eric and Tarina be ableRead More to afford their annual lengthy hipster vacation if they have to cough up lawyer fees? I am sure they were expecting that UCB (aka the rest of us) would pay Mr. Siegel's bill. Now they may have to resort to staying home and eating Top Ramen out of their charming and cheerful "made in Asia by small children but they're not slaving for 14 hours a day in front of our faces so we don't care" ceramic bowls. Oh noes! Bad, bad, very, very bad news.
Charles Burress (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 03:06 pm
David, thanks for the alert to the judge's decision.