.
Feedback

45 Percent Garbage Fee Increase Hits Residents Where it Hurts

Shocked by the new Waste Management bill? Here's what led to the 45 percent increase. [Editor's Note: We know this technically isn't "breaking news," but decided the story had deep enough community interest to send out a special alert.]

Many readers have written in this week, surprised and angered by the 45 percent rate increase announced in this month's Waste Management bill.

The average monthly fee jumped from about $25 up to $36, bringing quarterly payments to more than $100. In these tough economic times, where paycuts, furloughs and hiring freezes have left many cold, a number of residents have said the increase feels like a slap in the face.

But the higher rate, officials explained, is the result of more than a year of negotiations, and some consideration of alternatives, that led to a new 10-year solid waste collection agreement with Waste Management of Alameda County, approved by the city in October.

On Oct. 17, approved the agreement 4-1, with the lone dissenting vote. 

"We're asking ratepayers to ensure the necessary operating costs, including labor," she said, estimating trash hauler salaries at $100,000 to $130,000 per person, including benefits. "I have a real problem with this at this point in time. We're asking our employees, including our first responders, to take cuts, and pay for their own benefits. We're being asked to ask ratepayers to pay for ongoing labor costs of a third party. I'm very troubled about that. I just don't think that's good public policy at this point, when we're asking every single public employee to do something different." 

SERVICE COULD BE BETTER, RESIDENTS SAY

Residents at the meeting pointed to a failure by Waste Management to collect garbage thoroughly at the ; noted pervasive problems with haulers leaving bins in the streets; and asked why the city didn't simply extend the existing franchise agreement over the next two years, as was provided for in the former agreement.

Staff said that continuing to investigate options was a possibility, but that it would take more time and resources, after an already lengthy process, with no guarantee of better rates in the end.

The contract with Waste Management was last negotiated in 2003. Since then, said Albany's environmental specialist, Nicole Almaguer, there have been minimal rate increases. At the same time, service needs have changed and costs of waste removal have risen.

Rates, she wrote in an email to Albany Patch just prior to the Oct. 17 meeting, would likely be on the rise regardless of the hauler, as Albany's 2003 agreement was "outdated," and hadn't kept pace with annual operating costs for the industry.

At the Oct. 3 City Council meeting, Dominic Chiovare, president of the Teamsters Local 70 union, pointed out several changes to service since the last contract, such as increased demand for recycling and green waste disposal.

He also brought up rising health care and fuel costs as a driving factor in the spike. Of fuel costs, he said, "Nobody could have predicted (they) would get so high.”

(Waste Management is currently making the switch to alternative fuel vehicles.)

RELIEF FOR SOME

The city attempted to negotiate a discounted rate for low-income residents, but Waste Management would not agree to it. But Almaguer said, via email, that Albany is not alone. Fewer than half the cities in Alameda County receive a low-income discount, she said.

Waste Management did concede to a 20 percent discount for customers 62 years and older.

The new agreement caps the annual rate increase at 7.5 percent. Almaguer wrote in the Oct. 17 staff report that the increase was expected to be closer to 3.54-7.93 percent. At most, the company can raise rates 10 percent annually, but anything beyond a 7.5 percent increase will roll over into the following year.

As a result of the higher rate, the city will receive $11,000 per month in franchise fees. 

NEW SERVICES WILL CLOSE THE "CAP" GAP

The new agreement includes a number of innovative services. Albany will receive 15 solar-powered trash and recycling compactors along its major avenues, which the city says will “collect an increased amount of trash and recycling.”

Another motivation for the changes, said Almaguer, is Albany's , or "CAP," which outlines a "zero waste" diversion goal of 90 percent. At this time, the city and green waste.

(In June, Waste Management reported that the city kept  out of the dump.)

  • Among its services to help close the gap, Waste Management will accept all plastics, other than hangers and utensils, within the curbside recycling container.
  • The city will implement an outreach program focused on increasing waste diversion in multifamily residences.
  • Single-family residences will be able to use curbside recycling for household batteries, fluorescent bulbs and mobile phones. 
  • There will be one annual on-call bulky item pickup, with an optional second pickup.
  • Residents will be able to participate in two compost giveaway events per year.
  • To help with new programs and services, Waste Management will provide $4,500 per month for additional staffing.

The agreement also includes new strike provisions for haulers who are part of the Teamsters Local 70. The city negotiated a provision for missed service days, in the event of a strike, from 10 days down to five for residential services, as well as commercial recycling services. The contract ensures a service gap of not more than two days for trash and organics services for businesses.

WHAT COMES NEXT?

Almaguer said Friday that the city is working on outreach materials to be mailed to residents in the coming weeks. The mailing will detail new service offerings, materials that can be recycled, opportunities for decreased trash service levels, and upcoming events such as compost giveaways.

For more information about the new services and outreach programs, read the city release here. To find out even more, see the new rate chart and staff report, which are attached above as PDFs. All related documents from the June, July and Oct. 3 meetings appear above as well. 

What do you think of the new rate increase? Tell us in the comments. 

Click the "Keep me posted" button below for an alert when we write about recycling and garbage issues.

Everybody makes mistakes ... ! If there's something in this article you think should be corrected, or if something else is amiss, call editor Emilie Raguso at 510-459-8325 or email her at emilier@patch.com. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Albany Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jack Osborne May 23, 2013 at 05:52 pm
@Ross - And, lo, the rainbow-farting invisible unicorns would be displaced from this, the lastRead More "Class Sparkle" soil in the entire East Bay!
Ross Stapleton-Gray May 23, 2013 at 05:40 pm
Breaking news: The property at 6th and Harrison slated for Urban Adamah expansion has beenRead More "occupied" by a group calling itself Preserve the Vacancy. An anarcho-syndicalist offshoot of radical Buddhists, the group has declared that the current "vacant-lotness" is necessary to clarification of inner awareness, and that any planting there, sustainable or no, would be a tragedy. "This is one of the few undeveloped sites of Class 1 karmic balance left in the Bay area," said group spokesperson Shanti McErewhon.
Jack Osborne May 23, 2013 at 05:25 pm
David beat me to it on this one. Here's a great example of a much more reasonable approach toRead More supporting the principles that the OTFers claim to stand for. In fact, in my opinion Urban Adamah has put the OTF crowd to shame, and further driven home the point that their actions are truly misguided. And to also demystify all the blather about "Class 1" soil, what it's appropriate for, and whether it all really matters: http://soils.usda.gov/technical/handbook/contents/part622.html My favorite part: "Class II (2) soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or require moderate conservation practices." Sounds perfectly workable to me.
Lisa Schneider May 23, 2013 at 12:08 am
The occupiers complain that the meanies won't let them temporarily plant stuff on the futureRead More mixed-use project site, on the other hand the occupiers threaten a permanent occupation. This linked occupier image reminds me of Game of Drones (as in critters that perform no meaningful work) http://gallery.mailchimp.com/fef1cd615d86cfe1a43674873/images/ReOccupy_FARM_TOOLS.2.1f17376.jpg
Carla Harkness, center front with husband Bob, received the 2013 Lasallian Educator award at Saint Mary's High, May 17.  She is joined by other Educator honorees from prior years.
Peggy McQuaid May 20, 2013 at 11:26 am
Congratulations, Carla. The article failed to mention what a great neighbor you are.
Robby Sun May 20, 2013 at 10:37 pm
@Dover: The parent birds didn't look like doves. They were the commonly seen dull-yellowish birds.Read More Smaller than a pigeon but larger than a sparrow. Robins? I can't tell for sure. We checked the abandoned nest. To my eyes, it was well built, and stably setup between grape branches. It didn't capsize. The dead baby birds were found at least 5 feet away from the ground right beneath the nest. Something must have got them out of the nest and killed them. We didn't look at the corpses in detail to decide the cause of death though.
Robby Sun May 20, 2013 at 10:09 pm
@Ross: I was wondering that too. It could be the squirrels, which were very active in my backyardRead More and the neighborhood. They still are very active.
Dover May 20, 2013 at 09:31 am
I agree with Ross. A predator would have eaten those yummy, tender, tasty baby birds. It soundsRead More more like a case of incompetent nest construction to me. Were they doves? Doves are well-known for their inability to build proper nests but there are others who struggle too. Instinct and ability do not always travel hand-in-hand. Not much you can do about that, unfortunately. Some creatures are incompetent. Some people are incompetent. That's life.
Debris collection now at 10 days
Ralph Whize May 20, 2013 at 10:12 pm
Got thru to the City Inspector (twice) and he finally called the contractor, who (at the end of dayRead More 12 of trash build up) moved the debris pile away. Albany Planning Commission meeting is 2nd and 4th Wednesdays at 7:30 pm and I'm hoping local homeowners will take time to address this and other CV issues.
Dover May 20, 2013 at 09:40 am
Hey! Cool! Now I know where to dump my unwanted items! ;-) Seriously though, "the city"Read More is not helpless, "the city" is lazy and sometimes you have to kick them in the ass to get them moving. What have you tries thus far? I assume you have communicated with the CV owner or contractor. What else have you done?
Ann Farmer May 19, 2013 at 06:22 pm
This is not only an eyesore. This is a health hazard. The boards you see in the photo have nailsRead More sticking out. This area has become the trash heap for anyone walking by wanting to dispose of garbage. With bins overflowing, trash is blown down the street into residents' yards.
Super girl at wizard world con
Announcements/Around Town  

0   Recommend J M

Super girl at wizard world con
Jamie Jensen May 23, 2013 at 06:29 am
I intended to add: Now, if only UCB would treat its other land holdings, like the Gill Tract, withRead More similar respect. Who wants another parking lot? Not me. Build "Senior Housing" at transit-friendly El Cerrito Plaza, not on the last patch of arable land left in the East Bay!
Jamie Jensen May 23, 2013 at 06:26 am
This Executive Summary, makes it sound OK. Better than another 1991 Fire, for sure: To reduce theRead More potential for these areas to support and spread wildfires, UCB proposes to eliminate eucalyptus, Monterey pine, and other non-native trees that promote the spread of wildfire. Oak and bay trees and other native vegetation present under the larger non-native trees would be preserved and encouraged to expand.
Caryl O'Keefe May 18, 2013 at 08:30 pm
Another example of more balanced reporting from Berkeleyside article:Read More http://www.berkeleyside.com/2013/05/17/uc-berkeley-seeks-funds-to-cut-down-22000-non-native-trees/. Some of the comments are useful especially about glyphosphate. The author of the article even used his own name.
Mel Content May 19, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Sources and cites, please?
Mel Content May 19, 2013 at 12:01 pm
"If you are upset about how the rightwing has been attacking President Obama with lies andRead More hyperbole"
Mel Content May 19, 2013 at 12:01 pm
"If you are upset about how the rightwing has been attacking President Obama with lies andRead More hyperbole"